Two Constitutions and Fraud. The united states of America vs. the UNITED STATES!

In 1995 The Republican Party of Texas recognized, that the acts of the Congressional Body and the Office of the President of the united States of America created a Purported (Fraudulent) Emergency condition, and that on and after March 6, 1933 the same said Public Offices effectively impaired and suspended the Constitution of the United States only, "Not" the Constitution for the united states of America.
Whereas: The Constitution of the United States is no more than a Corporate Charter.
Therefore: The Constitution for the united states of America with its original 13 Amendments still stands Ordained and Established by the People.
Whereas: The same said Public Offices mentioned above Effectively suspended and Impaired the Constitution of the United States, (A Corporate Charter) Pursuant to  February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62, And Pursuant to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation, (15) "United States" means —
   (A) a Federal corporation;   (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
   (C) an instrumentality of the United States.

U.S. Supreme Court
STOUTENBURGH v. HENNICK, 129 U.S. 141 (1889)
129 U.S. 141
STOUTENBURGH, Intendant of Washington Asylum,
v.
HENNICK.
January 14, 1889

Sections 1 and 18 of the act of congress of February 21, 1871, entitled 'An act to provide a government for the District of Columbia,' (16 St. 419,) are as follows: 'Section 1. That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes, and may contract and be contracted with, sue and be sued, plead and be impleaded, have a seal, and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation not inconsistent with the constitution and laws of the United States and the provisions of this act.' 'Sec. 18. That the legislative power of the District shall [129 U.S. 141, 144]   extend to all rightful subjects of legislation within said District, consistent with the constitution of the United States and the provisions of this act, subject, nevertheless, to all the restrictions and limitations imposed upon states by the tenth section of the first article of the constitution of the United States; but all acts of the legislative assembly shall at all times be subject to repeal or modification by the congress of the United States, and nothing herein shall be construed to deprive congress of the power of legislation over said District in as ample manner as if this law had not been enacted.' These sections are carried forward into the act of congress of June 22, 1874, entitled 'An act to revise and consolidate the statutes of the United States, general and permanent in their nature, relating to the District of Columbia, in force on the first day of December, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-three,' as sections 2, 49, 50.

Whereas: The Constitution does provide that Congress has the power to exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever over such DISTRICT NOT EXCEEDING TEN MILES SQUARE, as may, by session of particular states and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of government of the United States.
And Whereas: On February 21, 1871, the Forty First Congress passed an act entitled "An Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia," legislating the organization of a municipal corporation to run the day to day affairs of the District of Columbia, the seat of government, which transferred the United States of America, the Republic, into "a corporate entity" entitled UNITED STATES, in capital letters, having "no" jurisdiction outside the District of Columbia.
And Whereas: Congress adopted the text of the federal constitution as the constitution or charter of this municipal corporation. This municipal corporation was granted the power to contract to provide municipal services to the inhabitants of the District of Columbia and necessarily as an operation of the privileges and immunity clause of Article Four of the Constitution, any other person who chooses to contract for its services.

 "The Constitution for the united states of America".

The altered version reads: "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not. 

 So, Congress committed TREASON against the People, who were considered Sovereign under the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution

 The UNITED STATES government is basically a corporate instrument of the international bankers. 

 Treason was committed against the People in 1871 by the Congress. This could have been corrected through the decades by some honest men (assuming there were some), but it was not, mainly due to lust for money and power. 

 By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the Declaration of Independence and the original Constitution.

The US corporation (originally called the District of Columbia) does not effect or control the 50 sovereign states that are protected from the federal government by the US Constitution for the United States adopted in 1788.
The same said Public Offices mentioned above Effectively Suspended and Impaired the Constitution of the United States (A Corporate Charter) Under Pretense of Fraud of these same Emergency Conditions.
The Impairments and Disabilities yet exist and are in full force and effect throughout the Nation and Several States of the Union. There has occured continuous breech of trust, duty and obligation imposed under Alleged Authority of the Constitution of the United States (A Corporate Charter), resulting continued abridgement of Rights, Privlages, Immunities, and Liberties of Citizens and others, all commited under Pretense of Fraud of a continuing National crises and Furtherance of Emergency Conditions.

In the "Forward" of the United States Senate Report 93-549, 1973 it States "Since March 9, 1933, the United States of America has been in a declared state of National Emergency (Bankruptcy), which has not been resolved.
Senate Report 93-549, 1973, admits and professes that "This vast range of powers taken together confers enough authority to rule our country without reference to normal Constitutional Process."

Whereas: Notice Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111, and 6260 on or about March 4, to March 9, 1933.
In Title 12 U.S.C. sec 95b, it is arbitrarily declared that "The Actions, Regulations, Rules, Licenses, Orders and Proclamations heretofore and hereafter taken, promulgated, made or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury Since March 4, 1933, Pursuant to the authority conferred by Subsection (b) of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended (12 U.S.C. sec 95a), are hereby approved and confirmed, (March 9, 1933, Ch 1. Title 1. Sec 1. 48 Stat. 1.)
Therefore: It is recognized that every Order Issued by the President since March 9,1933, or any Order Issued thereafter is and was automatically approved and confirmed.
These Powers being conferred under Purported (Fraud) Authority of the Act of October 6, 1917 as Amended, are wrongfully used against the Several States of the Union and the People (See Stoehr vs. Wallace 255 US 239)
Notice the Banking Emergency Act, 48 Stat. 1. March 9, 1933, Pay Close Attention to Clause 5(b), which changed the wording of "Enemy" in the War Powers Act of October 6, 1917, as amended to "Citizens within this Country, by any Person within the United States, or any place subject to the Jurisdiction thereof."
Therefore Declaring "War" on the Sovereign American People, by the Fraudulent Corporate U.S., or U.S.A. INC. 


TO BE CONTINUED.

Alex Jones Video July 31st 2012

The Destiny of Humanity is Being Decided Right Now

Breaking News

Watch the Video:

Full Press Conference Sheriff Joe Arpaio Barack Obama Birth Certificate July 17, 2012

A Lesson From Crazy Horse by Chris Hedges

The original article is at this LINK

A Lesson From Crazy Horse by Chris Hedges

Native Americans' resistance to the westward expansion of Europeans took two forms. One was violence. The other was accommodation. Neither worked. Their land was stolen, their communities were decimated, their women and children were gunned down and the environment was ravaged. There was no legal recourse. There was no justice. There never is for the oppressed. And as we face similar forces of predatory, unchecked corporate power intent on ruthless exploitation and stripping us of legal and physical protection, we must confront how we will respond.
The ideologues of rapacious capitalism, like members of a primitive cult, chant the false mantra that natural resources and expansion are infinite. They dismiss calls for equitable distribution as unnecessary. They say that all will soon share in the "expanding" wealth, which in fact is swiftly diminishing. And as the whole demented project unravels, the elites flee like roaches to their sanctuaries. At the very end, it all will come down like a house of cards.
Civilizations in the final stages of decay are dominated by elites out of touch with reality. Societies strain harder and harder to sustain the decadent opulence of the ruling class, even as it destroys the foundations of productivity and wealth. Karl Marx was correct when he called unregulated capitalism "a machine for demolishing limits." This failure to impose limits cannibalizes natural resources and human communities. This time, the difference is that when we go the whole planet will go with us. Catastrophic climate change is inevitable. Arctic ice is in terminal decline. There will soon be so much heat trapped in the atmosphere that any attempt to scale back carbon emissions will make no difference. Droughts. Floods. Heat waves. Killer hurricanes and tornados. Power outages. Freak weather. Rising sea levels. Crop destruction. Food shortages. Plagues.
ExxonMobil, BP and the coal and natural gas companies—like the colonial buffalo hunters who left thousands of carcasses rotting in the sun after stripping away the hides, and in some cases carrying away only the tongues—will never impose rational limits on themselves. They will exploit, like the hustlers before them who eliminated the animals that sustained the native peoples of the Great Plains, until there is nothing left to exploit. Collective suicide is never factored into quarterly profit reports. Forget all those virtuous words they taught you in school about our system of government. The real words to describe American power are "plunder," "fraud," "criminality," "deceit," "murder" and "repression."
Those native communities that were most accommodating to the European colonists, such as the peaceful California tribes—the Chilulas, Chimarikos, Urebures, Nipewais and Alonas, along with a hundred other bands—were the first to be destroyed. And while I do not advocate violence, indeed will seek every way to avoid it, I have no intention of accommodating corporate power whether it hides behind the mask of Barack Obama or Mitt Romney. At the same time, I have to acknowledge that resistance may ultimately be in vain. Yet to resist is to say something about us as human beings. It keeps alive the possibility of hope, even as all empirical evidence points to inevitable destruction. It makes victory, however remote, possible. And it makes life a little more difficult for the ruling class, which satisfies the very human emotion of vengeance.
"Whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power," wrote the philosopher John Locke, "they put themselves into a state of war with the people who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience."
The European colonists signed, and ignored, some 400 treaties with native tribes. They enticed the native leaders into accords, always to seize land, and then repeated the betrayal again and again and again until there was nothing left to steal. Chiefs such as Black Kettle who believed the white men did not fare much better than those who did not. Black Kettle, who outside his lodge often flew a huge American flag given to him in Washington as a sign of friendship, was shot dead by soldiers of George Armstrong Custer in November 1868 along with his wife and more than 100 other Cheyenne in his encampment on the Washita River.
The white men "made us many promises, more than I can remember," Chief Red Cloud said in old age, "but they kept but one. They promised to take our land, and they took it."
Native societies, in which people redistributed wealth to gain respect, and in which those who hoarded were detested, upheld a communal ethic that had to be obliterated and replaced with the greed, ceaseless exploitation and cult of the self that fuel capitalist expansion. Lewis Henry Morgan in his book "League of the Iroquois," written in 1851 after he lived among them, noted that the Iroquois' "whole civil policy was averse to the concentration of power in the hands of any single individual, but inclined to the opposite principle of division among a number of equals. ..." This was a way of relating to each other, as well as to the natural world, that was an anathema to the European colonizers.
Those who exploit do so through layers of deceit. They hire charming and eloquent interlocutors. How many more times do you want to be lied to by Barack Obama? What is this penchant for self-delusion that makes us unable to see that we are being sold into bondage? Why do we trust those who do not deserve our trust? Why are we repeatedly seduced? The promised closure of Guantanamo. The public option in health care. Reforming the Patriot Act. Environmental protection. Restoring habeas corpus. Regulating Wall Street. Ending the wars. Jobs. Defending labor rights. I could go on.
There are few resistance figures in American history as noble as Crazy Horse. He led, long after he knew that ultimate defeat was inevitable, the most effective revolt on the plains, wiping out Custer and his men on the Little Big Horn. "Even the most basic outline of his life shows how great he was," Ian Frazier writes in his book "Great Plains," "because he remained himself from the moment of his birth to the moment he died; because he knew exactly where he wanted to live, and never left; because he may have surrendered, but he was never defeated in battle; because, although he was killed, even the Army admitted he was never captured; because he was so free that he didn't know what a jail looked like." His "dislike of the oncoming civilization was prophetic," Frazier writes. "He never met the President" and "never rode on a train, slept in a boarding house, ate at a table." And "unlike many people all over the world, when he met white men he was not diminished by the encounter."
Crazy Horse was bayoneted to death on Sept. 5, 1877, after being tricked into walking toward the jail at Fort Robinson in Nebraska. The moment he understood the trap he pulled out a knife and fought back. Gen. Phil Sheridan had intended to ship Crazy Horse to the Dry Tortugas, a group of small islands in the Gulf of Mexico, where a U.S. Army garrison ran a prison with cells dug out of the coral. Crazy Horse, even when dying, refused to lie on the white man's cot. He insisted on being placed on the floor. Armed soldiers stood by until he died. And when he breathed his last, Touch the Clouds, Crazy Horse's seven-foot-tall Miniconjou friend, pointed to the blanket that covered the chief's body and said, "This is the lodge of Crazy Horse." His grieving parents buried Crazy Horse in an undisclosed location. Legend says that his bones turned to rocks and his joints to flint. His ferocity of spirit remains a guiding light for all who seek lives of defiance.

Reality Check: If Healthcare Law Is A Tax Is It Now Invalid?

Video: If Healthcare Law Is A Tax Is It Now Invalid?

No Bibles at Walter Reed Hospital?

This Administration is unbelievable! I can't understand why the Navy went along with this.

Bibles at Walter Reed

Obama must really want to be a one term president. The soldiers who wake up in Walter Reed Medical Center are in Maryland --not communist China . But under the Navy's new rules, they may not know the difference!

After months of peeling away the military's core values, Obama's army is on the move. And this time, it has a high-value target: the Bible.

In a memo obtained by FRC, Navy officials have announced that "no religious items (including Bibles, reading material, and/or artifacts) are allowed to be given away or used during a visit." The new orders are buried in a four-page document about patient care, which an Army officer forwarded to us in disbelief.

Effective immediately, families, friends, and even pastors will have to check their beliefs at the door to visit one of the largest military hospitals in the United States . Last night, after we circulated the memo to leaders on the Hill, an outraged Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) took to the House floor and blasted the policy.

"Mr. Speaker, these military men and women who are recovering at Walter Reed and Bethesda have given their all for America ... They've defended and taken an oath to the Constitution, and here they are. The people that come to visit them can't bring a religious artifact? They can't bring a Bible? ...A priest can't walk in with the Eucharist and offer communion to a patient who might be on their deathbed because it's prohibited in this memo from the Department of the Navy?"

This is Obama's military, where homosexuality is celebrated and Christianity is censored; where witches are financed and crosses are scorned; where bestiality is embraced and Bibles are banned; where same-sex "weddings" are encouraged but international charity is not. After three years of ideological warfare, the administration's intent is clear: to disarm the military of its biggest weapon. Faith.

Regardless of President Obama's agenda, there is absolutely nothing in the Constitution that empowers the government to stop family members from giving Bibles or crosses to their loved ones. And from a PR standpoint, I'm not sure the best way to boost approval ratings is by denying comfort to wounded warriors. Unfortunately for our troops, who have endured so much turmoil under the Obama administration, this is another blow.

Hopefully, with the help of Congressman King and others, it's only a temporary one.

Even liberal Snopes says it's true.:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/walterreed.asp

Joint Resolution of the Congress of the United States, December 29th, 1846

     Joint Resolution of the Congress of the United States, December 29, 1846

29th Congress first Session

Begun and held in the city of Washington, in the District of Columbia, on Monday, the first day of December eighteenhundred and forty- five.

Joint Resolution the admission of the state of Texas into the Union.

Whereas, the Congress of the United States, by a Joint Resolution approved March the first, eighteen hundred and forty- five,

did consent that the territory properly included within, and rightfully belonging to the Republic of Texas, might be erected into a new State, to be called the State of Texas, with a republican for of government, to be adopted by the people of said republic, by deputies by Convention assembled, with the consent of the existing government, that the same might be added as one of the states of the Union: which consent of the Congress was given upon certain conditions specified in the first and second sections of said Joint Resolution: And whereas, the people of said Republic of Texas, and by their authority, did ordain and did declare, that they assented to and accepted the proposals, conditions, and guarantees contained in first and second sections of said resolution: And whereas the sais Constitution, with proper evidence of its adoption by the people of the republic of Texas, has been transmitted to the President of the United States, and laid before Congress, in conformity of the provisions of said Joint Resolution:

Therefore

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the state of Texas shall be one, and is hereby declared to be one, of the United States of America, and admitted to the Union on equal footing with the original states, in all respects whatever.

Section 2. And be it further resolved, That untill the representatives in Congress shall be apportioned according to an acctual enumeration of inhabitance of the United States, the state of Texas shall be intitled to choose two representatives.

John W Davis

Speaker of the House of Representatives

G.M. Dallas

President of the Senate

Approved December 29, 1845

James K.Polk.

Source:

Treaties and Other International Acts of the United States of America.

Edited by Hunter Miller.

Volume 4

Documents 80-121: 1836-1846

Washington: Government Printing Office. 1934.

http//www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/texan04.htm

RELATED LINKS

YOUTUBE

TWITTER