Two Constitutions and Fraud. The united states of America Vs. the UNITED STATES.
In 1995 The Republican Party of Texas recognized, that the acts of the Congressional Body and the Office of the President of the united States of America created a Purported (Fraudulent) Emergency condition, and that on and after March 6, 1933 the same said Public Offices effectively impaired and suspended the Constitution of the United States only, "Not" the Constitution for the united states of America.
Whereas: The Constitution of the United States is no more than a Corporate Charter.
Therefore: The Constitution for the united states of America with its original 13 Amendments still stands Ordained and Established by the People.
Whereas: The same said Public Offices mentioned above Effectively suspended and Impaired the Constitution of the United States, (A Corporate Charter) Pursuant to February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62, And Pursuant to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation, (15) "United States" means —
(A) a Federal corporation; (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.
U.S. Supreme Court
STOUTENBURGH v. HENNICK, 129 U.S. 141 (1889)
129 U.S. 141
STOUTENBURGH, Intendant of Washington Asylum,
January 14, 1889
Sections 1 and 18 of the act of congress of February 21, 1871, entitled 'An act to provide a government for the District of Columbia,' (16 St. 419,) are as follows: 'Section 1. That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes, and may contract and be contracted with, sue and be sued, plead and be impleaded, have a seal, and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation not inconsistent with the constitution and laws of the United States and the provisions of this act.' 'Sec. 18. That the legislative power of the District shall [129 U.S. 141, 144] extend to all rightful subjects of legislation within said District, consistent with the constitution of the United States and the provisions of this act, subject, nevertheless, to all the restrictions and limitations imposed upon states by the tenth section of the first article of the constitution of the United States; but all acts of the legislative assembly shall at all times be subject to repeal or modification by the congress of the United States, and nothing herein shall be construed to deprive congress of the power of legislation over said District in as ample manner as if this law had not been enacted.' These sections are carried forward into the act of congress of June 22, 1874, entitled 'An act to revise and consolidate the statutes of the United States, general and permanent in their nature, relating to the District of Columbia, in force on the first day of December, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-three,' as sections 2, 49, 50.
Whereas: The Constitution does provide that Congress has the power to exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever over such DISTRICT NOT EXCEEDING TEN MILES SQUARE, as may, by session of particular states and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of government of the United States.
And Whereas: On February 21, 1871, the Forty First Congress passed an act entitled "An Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia," legislating the organization of a municipal corporation to run the day to day affairs of the District of Columbia, the seat of government, which transferred the United States of America, the Republic, into "a corporate entity" entitled UNITED STATES, in capital letters, having "no" jurisdiction outside the District of Columbia.
And Whereas: Congress adopted the text of the federal constitution as the constitution or charter of this municipal corporation. This municipal corporation was granted the power to contract to provide municipal services to the inhabitants of the District of Columbia and necessarily as an operation of the privileges and immunity clause of Article Four of the Constitution, any other person who chooses to contract for its services.
"The Constitution for the united states of America".
The altered version reads: "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not.
So, Congress committed TREASON against the People, who were considered Sovereign under the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution
The UNITED STATES government is basically a corporate instrument of the international bankers.
Treason was committed against the People in 1871 by the Congress. This could have been corrected through the decades by some honest men (assuming there were some), but it was not, mainly due to lust for money and power.
By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the Declaration of Independence and the original Constitution.The US corporation (originally called the District of Columbia) does not effect or control the 50 sovereign states that are protected from the federal government by the US Constitution for the United States adopted in 1788.
The same said Public Offices mentioned above Effectively Suspended and Impaired the Constitution of the United States (A Corporate Charter) Under Pretense of Fraud of these same Emergency Conditions.
The Impairments and Disabilities yet exist and are in full force and effect throughout the Nation and Several States of the Union. There has occured continuous breech of trust, duty and obligation imposed under Alleged Authority of the Constitution of the United States (A Corporate Charter), resulting continued abridgement of Rights, Privlages, Immunities, and Liberties of Citizens and others, all commited under Pretense of Fraud of a continuing National crises and Furtherance of Emergency Conditions.
In the "Forward" of the United States Senate Report 93-549, 1973 it States "Since March 9, 1933, the United States of America has been in a declared state of National Emergency (Bankruptcy), which has not been resolved.
Senate Report 93-549, 1973, admits and professes that "This vast range of powers taken together confers enough authority to rule our country without reference to normal Constitutional Process."
Whereas: Notice Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111, and 6260 on or about March 4, to March 9, 1933.
In Title 12 U.S.C. sec 95b, it is arbitrarily declared that "The Actions, Regulations, Rules, Licenses, Orders and Proclamations heretofore and hereafter taken, promulgated, made or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury Since March 4, 1933, Pursuant to the authority conferred by Subsection (b) of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended (12 U.S.C. sec 95a), are hereby approved and confirmed, (March 9, 1933, Ch 1. Title 1. Sec 1. 48 Stat. 1.)
Therefore: It is recognized that every Order Issued by the President since March 9,1933, or any Order Issued thereafter is and was automatically approved and confirmed.
These Powers being conferred under Purported (Fraud) Authority of the Act of October 6, 1917 as Amended, are wrongfully used against the Several States of the Union and the People (See Stoehr vs. Wallace 255 US 239)
Notice the Banking Emergency Act, 48 Stat. 1. March 9, 1933, Pay Close Attention to Clause 5(b), which changed the wording of "Enemy" in the War Powers Act of October 6, 1917, as amended to "Citizens within this Country, by any Person within the United States, or any place subject to the Jurisdiction thereof."
Therefore Declaring "War" on the Sovereign American People, by the Fraudulent Corporate U.S., or U.S.A. INC.
So you mean they're sayin'?What is being dealt with is a Rogue Corporation with many Policies and Procedures of that Corporation, under the Corporate Charter that looks like the Beloved Constitution, But it is "Not"!
Each and every (Alleged Law) Policy and Procedure passed since Feb 13, 1871 is Not Law, but is actually FRAUD Perpetrated on the People during the Grant Administration.
That means each and every (Alleged Law) Policy and Procedure is UNCONSTITUTIONAL since Feb 13,1871:
Therefore: Marbury Vs. Madison 1803 comes into play, which states "That every Law passed that is UNCONSTITUTIONAL is Null and Void, Void ab-initio from the start."
The Constitution for the united states of America 1778 with its original 13 Amendments still stands as Positive Law!
Now the Constitution of the UNITED STATES 1871 is nothing more than a Corporate Charter, and due to F.D.R. in March 1933 that Corporate Charter, The Constitution of the UNITED STATES was suspended and never has been Re-instituted since.
Those Executive Orders and Presidential Directives are Corporate Policies that are UNCONSTITUTIONAL, Due to the fact they are Policies and Procedures of the Corporate Executive Officer of the Corporation A.K.A. UNITED STATES.
Now Article III. Section III to the Constitution for the united states of America, states:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted.
Every (Alleged Law) Policy and Procedure and Alleged Treaty since Feb 13, 1871 including the Executive Orders and Presidential Directives are an ACT of High Treason against the Constitution for the united states of America.
Therefore: My question is: Do you want a National President under the Constitution for the united states of America, or do you want to continue with a Corporate Executive Officer of a Rogue Corporation that has a suspended Charter since March 9, 1933?