Sunday, August 26, 2012

Counsel General Interim Gov't Republic of Texas Responds to Judge Tom Head

Counsel General Interim Gov't Republic of Texas 
Responds to Judge Tom Head 

 KCBD News Channel 11 Reports on Judge Tom Head with Counsel General at Podium 1:10 2/3

Counsel General was quoted by the New York Times and Austin American-Statesman:

“I believe that we need a sheriff’s militia to protect Lubbock County, and get all the sheriffs in Texas to start a militia to protect Texas,” Kim Wade Gatewood, 48, told the commissioners and Mr. Head.
After the hearing, Mr. Gatewood, an agricultural contractor, identified himself as the counsel general of the interim government of the Republic of Texas, which he said was not active at the moment. “If secession happens,” he said, “it’ll be active in a split second.” 
Read the full articles HERE 
and HERE
Text of the above Video:

At this point I do not know if there is anything I can do Officially as Counsel General of the Interim Government of the Republic of Texas, but as a fellow Texian-Texican National living on the soil of Texas, I do have to come out and Back Lubbock County Judge Tom Head and Yes, Civil unrest, Civil disobedience and maybe Civil War looms ahead for America, but Texas is a different story which may soon be on the blog
Now on Judge Tom Heads' comment on Standing at the border and just having the Sheriffs Office Back him,  the Invading Forces would run right over Judge Tom Head and the Sheriff's office.
We really need to raise the Tax  2 cents and every cent goes to beef up the Lubbock County Sheriffs Office, and form a Sheriff's Militia out of the Population in Lubbock County. I contend that the Sheriff and his Deputies Keep all the arresting Power as Peace Officers, but the Sheriff's Militia be trained for the contingency of Combat to be called out under the Sheriff in the case of an invasion. Every Person above the age of 18 who Does NOT have a Felony Record serve in the Sheriff's Militia's for the Protection of Lubbock County and for the Protection of Texas.
Just think of the Great Standing Army Texas would have, if each Sheriff in each County formed a Sheriff's Militia. Then the saying "Don't Mess With Texas" would be exact!
The Sheriff is the highest elected Official in the County and not even the Office of the President cannot usurp authority over him. That in itself would be a direct violation of the 10th Amendment and Article III sec. III of the Constitution for the united States of America.
Therefore; I Duly Hereby Stand and Back and Endorse Lubbock County Judge Tom Head and I call for the formation of the Sheriffs Militia.
As for county Democratic Party's chief  Kenny Ketner, Apparently you don't know what is going on, or just don't care. Due to the fact I have sat for 20 years doing my study and research. NO, Judge Tom Head does not need to resign, rather proceed for preparations in the event something goes awry as Judge Head Stated.
Attorney Rod Hobson, I do not take the fact you placed U.N. Flags around or near your Office as a joke. That offended me personally as a Natural Born Texian National. That is really Mocking and Serious to all Texians, and I don't appreciate what you said  about Tom Head, and I quote: "When I saw the story I thought, once again, Lubbock is going to be the laughingstock of the entire nation," you said. And you went on to say, and I quote: "What makes it so sad is he is our elected county judge, who is in charge of a multimillion-dollar budget. That is scary. It's like the light's on, but no one is home. ... I'd just like to think he's off his meds."
Sir, what meds? There is nothing wrong with Judge Tom Head.
Then the lone Democrat Lubbock County Commissioner Gilbert Flores, described Head with a colorful West Texas saying: "He's a six-pack short of a full case of beer, if you know what I mean."
Sir, You have not done your research either as I have many years and saying what you did about Judge Tom head is just ridiculous.

The Constitution for the united states of America 1787 states in the 10th Amendment:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Next: In the Second Amendment:
A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
A Sheriff's Militia would definitely be a well- regulated Militia.
Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attained.


That the general, great and essential principles of liberty and free government may be recognized and established, we declare:
Sec. 1.  FREEDOM AND SOVEREIGNTY OF STATE.  Texas is a free and independent State, subject only to the Constitution of the United States, and the maintenance of our free institutions and the perpetuity of the Union depend upon the preservation of the right of local self-government, unimpaired to all the States.
Sec. 2.  INHERENT POLITICAL POWER; REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT.  All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit.  The faith of the people of Texas stands pledged to the preservation of a republican form of government, and, subject to this limitation only, they have at all times the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think expedient.
Sec. 22.  TREASON.  Treason against the State shall consist only in levying war against it, or adhering to its enemies, giving them aid and comfort; and no person shall be convicted of treason except on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
Sec. 23.  RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS.  Every citizen shall have the right to keep and bear arms in the lawful defense of himself or the State; but the Legislature shall have power, by law, to regulate the wearing of arms, with a view to prevent crime.
Sec. 24.  MILITARY SUBORDINATE TO CIVIL AUTHORITY.  The military shall at all times be subordinate to the civil authority.
Sec. 25.  QUARTERING SOLDIERS IN HOUSES.  No soldier shall in time of peace be quartered in the house of any citizen without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war but in a manner prescribed by law.
In the Constitution of the Republic of Texas 1836.
This declaration of rights is declared to be a part of this constitution, and shall never be violated on any pretense whatever. And in order to guard against the transgression of the high powers which we have delegated, we declare that everything in this bill of rights contained, and every other right not hereby delegated, is reserved to the people.
1st. All men, when they form a social compact, have equal rights; and no men or set of men are entitled to exclusive public privileges or emoluments from the community.
2nd. All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their benefit; and they have at all times an inalienable right to alter their government in such manner as they may think proper.
14th. Every citizen shall have the right to bear arms in defense of himself and the republic.
The military shall at all times and in all cases be subordinate to the civil power.
15th. The sure and certain defense of a free people is a well-regulated militia; and it shall be the duty of the legislature to enact such laws as may be necessary to the organizing of the militia of this republic.
16th. Treason against this republic shall consist only in levying war against it, or adhering to its enemies, giving them aid and support. No retrospective or ex post facto law, or laws impairing the obligations of contracts, shall be made.
The sheriff is unique in the law enforcement arena in that he is the last, and only, law enforcement administrator that is elected to his office by the people. The administrative heads of all other law enforcement entities are appointed to their positions, either by mayors, city councils, city managers, and politicians or other managerial boards. The people have no voice in the selection of these law enforcement administrators, and no recourse if they do not agree with their policies. The sheriff is the only law enforcement official with the authority to summon the power of the county.....

The sheriff is the only law enforcement official with the authority to summon the power of the county. The sheriff's has the right, granted by Posse Comitatus, to assemble a militia or posse, and the power to deputize citizens and require them to assist in the keeping of the peace and the enforcement of laws. The sheriff represents the power of the people; he does not represent the power of the state. His use of the power of the state must not conflict with his obligation to protect the individual rights of the people whom he represents. When it comes to keeping the peace no one's authority exceeds that of the sheriff. The sheriff is absolutely obligated to his duty to protect the rights of the people, and that obligation is primary to any obligation whatever to support other law enforcement agencies in whatever cause.

The people in states where sheriff’s offices have not been unconstitutionally eliminated should demand that their sheriffs’ live up to their obligation to represent the interests of the people who elect them, and if they refuse to do so, the people should remove them because they are unfit to occupy the office.

The court confirms and asserts that “the duly elected sheriff of a county is the highest law enforcement official within a county and has law enforcement powers EXCEEDING that of any other state OR federal official.” And you thought the 10th Amendment was dead and buried.
(Case No. 2:96-cv-099-J (2006)) and announced that all federal officials are forbidden to enter his county without his prior approval ……
“If a sheriff doesn’t want the Feds in his county he has the constitutional right and power to keep them out, or ask them to leave, or retain them in custody.”
The Sheriff has the Right, Power, Duty and Obligation to tell all occupying Agency  from outside of Texas to vacate the County, Including the T.S.A.
The Sheriff's Duty and Obligation doubles with each Citizen who Demands that all occupying Agency  from outside of Texas to vacate the County, Including the T.S.A.


The “supremacy clause” is dealt with in Mack/Printz, in which the U.S. Supreme Court stated once and for all, that the only thing “supreme” is the Constitution itself. Where by the powers, the Sheriff reigns supreme above the president.
On June 27th, 1997, the sheriffs won; in Printz v. U.S. (521 U.S. 898) the U.S. Supreme Court struck Brady down. Associate Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the ruling for the Court, in which he explained our system of government at length. The justly revered system of checks and balances is the key:
THE COURTS HAVE SPOKEN! “Any legislation including the Patriot Acts which attempts to compel State Officers to execute Federal Law is unconstitutional. Further, any federal investigational liberties can be forbidden by the States’ highest law enforcement officer. Finally, any attempts by a federal agency to coerce compliance to such liberties can be grounds for arrest of any of their agents who do not comply with the directions of that officer.”
[A quote from the Supreme Court Case below:
"‘[T]he powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.’”]
And for the fact of: Pursuant to  February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62, And Pursuant to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation, (15) "United States" means —
   (A) a Federal corporation;   (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
   (C) an instrumentality of the United States.

U.S. Supreme Court
STOUTENBURGH v. HENNICK, 129 U.S. 141 (1889)
129 U.S. 141
STOUTENBURGH, Intendant of Washington Asylum,
January 14, 1889

Sections 1 and 18 of the act of congress of February 21, 1871, entitled 'An act to provide a government for the District of Columbia,' (16 St. 419,) are as follows: 'Section 1. That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes, and may contract and be contracted with, sue and be sued, plead and be impleaded, have a seal, and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation not inconsistent with the constitution and laws of the United States and the provisions of this act.' 'Sec. 18. That the legislative power of the District shall [129 U.S. 141, 144]   extend to all rightful subjects of legislation within said District, consistent with the constitution of the United States and the provisions of this act, subject, nevertheless, to all the restrictions and limitations imposed upon states by the tenth section of the first article of the constitution of the United States; but all acts of the legislative assembly shall at all times be subject to repeal or modification by the congress of the United States, and nothing herein shall be construed to deprive congress of the power of legislation over said District in as ample manner as if this law had not been enacted.' These sections are carried forward into the act of congress of June 22, 1874, entitled 'An act to revise and consolidate the statutes of the United States, general and permanent in their nature, relating to the District of Columbia, in force on the first day of December, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-three,' as sections 2, 49, 50.

Whereas: The Constitution does provide that Congress has the power to exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever over such district not exceeding ten miles square, as may, by session of particular states and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of government of the United States.
And Whereas: On February 21, 1871, the Forty First Congress passed an act entitled "An Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia," legislating the organization of a municipal corporation to run the day to day affairs of the District of Columbia, the seat of government, which transferred the United States of America, the Republic, into "a corporate entity" entitled UNITED STATES, in capital letters, having "no" jurisdiction outside the District of Columbia.
And Whereas: Congress adopted the text of the federal constitution as the constitution or charter of this municipal corporation. This municipal corporation was granted the power to contract to provide municipal services to the inhabitants of the District of Columbia and necessarily as an operation of the privileges and immunity clause of Article Four of the Constitution, any other person who chooses to contract for its services.
The US corporation (originally called the District of Columbia ) does not effect or control the 50 sovereign states that are protected from the federal government by the US Constitution for the United States adopted in 1788.

No comments:

Post a Comment